Tuesday, November 01, 2011

No phones, radios, internet on 11/9/11

On 11/9/11 the US government intends to sever all domestic communication for approximately  three minutes or 180 seconds.  This is being done not for the welfare of the of the citizens of the United States, but for the welfare of the US government.  

With this, already in place, capability the US government is stating to the citizens of the United States that, IT, the US government has complete control of all domestic communications. 

The Feds state that this is a test of the emergency response system, the terror alert system.  The Feds plan to enact a complete communications shutdown: all TV, radio, internet, and phone systems will be disabled simultaneously. This will be at 1:00 CST.

My question is this "When would it be advantageous to the citizens of the United States of America to be denied breaking national emergency communications?"

Answer: NEVER!!!

Now, pose that same question for the federal government:

  "When would it be advantageous to the Federal government to sever all national and domestic communication?"

Answer: Whenever the Federal government feels threatened by a free and informed citizenry!  

If this were a test to make sure the system was intact in the event of an emergency I could understand it.  This, however, isn't that!   This is the US government demonstrating by FORCE that all life, liberty, and ALLOWED communication derives from the US Federal government.

From 11/9/11 it will be the US government who will decide what, when, and IF the people of the United States of America are allowed to hear information.

What does this mean?

Think Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.  As the anti-government crowds grew in Egypt, what did the government do? They shut down all cell phones and internet access in an effort to halt communications.  So that the protesters would be hampered in their attempts to join together and demand that the rouge few who have seized control of a once free government be ousted from office. 

No comments: